9 Best RSA Alternatives and Competitors in 2026

RSA provides identity security products that help organizations manage access, authenticate users, enforce security policies, and meet compliance requirements. Its portfolio includes RSA ID Plus for authentication and access management, RSA Governance & Lifecycle for identity governance, and RSA’s broader identity security capabilities. Organizations use these products to protect workforce access, manage permissions, support access reviews, and reduce identity-related risks across business applications and infrastructure.

However, identity security requirements differ across organizations. Enterprises replacing an identity governance platform may prioritize access certifications, automated provisioning, segregation of duties, and compliance reporting. Teams reviewing an authentication product may instead focus on multifactor authentication (MFA), passwordless access, phishing-resistant credentials, and risk-based authentication. Other organizations need privileged access management or stronger controls over service accounts and AI agents. These differences make it important to compare alternatives against the specific RSA product in use.

The best RSA alternatives include SailPoint, Saviynt, One Identity, Okta, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping Identity, CyberArk, Cisco Duo, and Yubico. These platforms cover different parts of the identity security landscape, from enterprise identity governance and workforce access to privileged access and hardware-based authentication. Some provide broad identity platforms, while others specialize in particular security controls and may need to be combined with another product.

This guide compares nine RSA alternatives in 2026, covering their key features, deployment options, pricing models, and use cases. It also considers AI-driven identity security and non-human identity governance, which are increasingly important as organizations deploy automated services and AI agents. The goal is to help you identify a platform that meets your security, compliance, and operational requirements without paying for capabilities you do not need.

Why Look for RSA Alternatives?

RSA supports several identity security use cases, but organizations may explore alternatives when their requirements or existing technology environments change.

• Different identity requirements: Teams focused on governance, workforce authentication, or privileged access may find that a specialized platform better matches their primary use case.
• Integration requirements: Organizations should verify compatibility with their directories, enterprise applications, cloud platforms, HR systems, and existing security tools.
• Deployment preferences: Some businesses prefer cloud-native identity services, while others require self-hosted, hybrid, or hardware-based authentication options.
• Administrative complexity: Enterprises with large application estates may prioritize automated provisioning, access reviews, policy management, and simpler administration.
• Authentication methods: Organizations may need stronger phishing-resistant MFA, passkeys, passwordless access, or hardware security keys.
• AI and non-human identities: Businesses should compare agent discovery, identity ownership, permissions, lifecycle controls, and audit capabilities. RSA already offers AI-related identity security and non-human identity governance capabilities, so the relevant question is which platform best fits the required controls.

RSA Alternatives Comparison

The table below compares nine RSA alternatives across identity governance, workforce access, privileged access, and authentication. Because these tools do not all replace the same RSA products, evaluate the capabilities relevant to your deployment before comparing prices.

Tool	Deployment	Best For	Pricing	G2 Rating
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud	SaaS	Enterprise identity governance and lifecycle management	Custom quote	4.6/5
Saviynt Identity Cloud	SaaS	Enterprise IGA, access risk, and non-human identity governance	Custom quote	4.3/5
One Identity Manager	Hybrid / on-premises options	Identity lifecycle and access governance	Custom quote	N/A
Okta Workforce Identity	SaaS	Workforce SSO, MFA, and lifecycle management	Starter: $6/user/month; Essentials: $17/user/month	4.5/5
Microsoft Entra ID	SaaS / hybrid identity	Microsoft-centric workforce IAM and Conditional Access	P1: $7/user/month; P2: $10/user/month, US annual billing	4.5/5
Ping Identity	SaaS / hybrid options	Enterprise authentication and access management	Workforce Essential: $3/user/month; Plus: $6/user/month, subject to contract minimums	4.4/5
Idira (formerly CyberArk)	SaaS / hybrid options	Privileged access and workforce identity security	Custom quote for most enterprise products	4.5/5
Cisco Duo	SaaS	MFA, passwordless authentication, and device-aware access	Free for up to 10 users; paid plans from $3/user/month	4.5/5
Yubico	Hardware security keys / supported integrations	Phishing-resistant authentication	Hardware purchased separately; business pricing depends on key model and volume	N/A

Top 9 RSA Alternatives in 2026

The following alternatives cover the main reasons organizations evaluate RSA competitors. Choose a governance platform for access lifecycle and compliance, a workforce identity platform for application access, or a specialized authentication or privileged access product when the requirement is narrower.

#1. SailPoint Identity Security Cloud

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud is an identity security and governance platform designed for organizations managing access across large application estates. It helps security and IT teams understand who has access to which resources, automate identity lifecycle processes, and enforce access policies. Its governance capabilities are relevant to organizations that use RSA Governance & Lifecycle for compliance, access reviews, and centralized identity administration.

SailPoint supports access requests, certifications, provisioning, policy enforcement, and analytics across connected applications and systems. Its identity security capabilities also extend to non-human identities, including service accounts and other machine identities, depending on the product configuration. Pricing is generally quote-based, with costs depending on the organization’s size, required modules, integrations, and deployment needs.

SailPoint is worth evaluating when identity governance is the primary reason for replacing RSA. It is not simply an authentication product, and organizations should compare governance depth rather than only SSO or MFA functionality. Before migrating, assess application connectors, identity data quality, role models, certification workflows, and the effort required to reproduce existing policies and compliance reports.

Key Features

• Identity lifecycle management: Automates identity-related processes associated with joining, changing roles, and leaving an organization.
• Access certifications: Helps managers and application owners review and validate existing permissions.
• Access requests: Supports structured requests, approvals, and assignment of appropriate access.
• Automated provisioning: Connects identity governance workflows with supported applications and directories.
• Policy enforcement: Helps identify inappropriate access and enforce governance rules.
• Identity analytics: Provides visibility into identity access and potential governance risks.
• Non-human identity governance: Supports governance of machine identities and related access, depending on the product configuration.
• Compliance reporting: Helps organizations document access decisions and demonstrate governance controls.

Also Read: SailPoint Alternatives and Competitors

#2. Saviynt Identity Cloud

Saviynt Identity Cloud provides identity governance and administration capabilities for enterprises that need to manage permissions across business applications, cloud environments, and infrastructure. It is a relevant RSA Governance & Lifecycle alternative for organizations that want to centralize access governance, automate provisioning, and improve visibility into identity-related risks.

Saviynt supports access requests, certifications, lifecycle management, policy controls, and governance across supported systems. Its identity security portfolio also addresses non-human identities and AI-related identity risks, helping organizations evaluate access associated with automated workloads and agents. Pricing is typically based on the customer’s requirements and negotiated scope rather than a single public per-user rate.

Saviynt is worth considering when governance, compliance, and risk management are central to the evaluation. Buyers should assess the quality of integrations for their application estate, the effort needed to configure workflows, and the operational resources required to maintain governance policies. A proof of concept should include access certification, provisioning, policy enforcement, and any non-human identity scenarios that are important to the organization.

Key Features

• Identity governance: Centralizes governance processes across supported identities, applications, and resources.
• Access certifications: Supports periodic review and validation of permissions.
• Automated provisioning: Helps automate account creation, access changes, and deprovisioning.
• Access request workflows: Provides structured requests, approvals, and policy-based assignment.
• Risk-based access controls: Helps identify and manage access risks across supported systems.
• Compliance support: Provides governance records and reporting for audit and compliance processes.
• Non-human identity governance: Extends identity governance to supported machine identities and automated workloads.
• Cloud application governance: Supports governance across connected enterprise and cloud applications.

Also Read: Saviynt Alternatives and Competitors

#3. One Identity Manager

One Identity Manager is an identity governance and administration platform designed to manage access across complex enterprise environments. It supports identity lifecycle management, provisioning, access requests, compliance workflows, and role-based access controls. Organizations considering alternatives to RSA Governance & Lifecycle can evaluate it when they need governance processes spanning multiple applications, directories, and business systems.

One Identity Manager can connect identity information with business processes to automate access changes as employees join, change roles, or leave the organization. It supports configurable workflows, permissions management, and access governance for connected systems. Pricing is generally quote-based and depends on the licensing model, deployment, product scope, and size of the environment.

The platform is relevant to organizations that need detailed control over identity workflows and application permissions. However, buyers should account for implementation effort, integration coverage, and the administrative skills required to maintain complex configurations. Compare its governance capabilities with the specific RSA modules in use, particularly for access certifications, segregation of duties, provisioning, and audit reporting.

Key Features

• Identity lifecycle management: Manages identity changes across the employee lifecycle.
• Automated provisioning: Supports account and permission updates across connected applications.
• Access request management: Provides workflows for requesting and approving access.
• Role-based access controls: Helps assign permissions according to organizational roles and policies.
• Access governance: Supports reviews and governance processes for existing permissions.
• Segregation of duties: Helps identify and control conflicting permissions where configured.
• Directory integration: Connects identity workflows with supported directories and business systems.
• Compliance reporting: Helps document identity changes, approvals, and governance activity.

Also Read: One Identity Alternatives and Competitors

#4. Okta Workforce Identity

Okta Workforce Identity provides workforce authentication, application access, and identity lifecycle capabilities. It is relevant when an organization uses RSA primarily for workforce access, SSO, and MFA rather than for deep identity governance. Okta helps centralize authentication and connect employees to cloud and enterprise applications through supported integrations.

Okta’s public pricing lists Starter at $6 per user per month and Essentials at $17 per user per month. Starter includes SSO, MFA, Universal Directory, and a limited number of Workflows. Essentials adds capabilities such as adaptive MFA, privileged access, lifecycle management, access governance, and additional workflows. More advanced requirements may require higher-tier products or separate add-ons.

Okta is worth considering for organizations that want a workforce identity platform with a broad application integration ecosystem. However, it should not automatically be treated as a complete replacement for every RSA governance or privileged access capability. Buyers should map existing governance workflows, privileged account requirements, and compliance controls before deciding which Okta products and integrations are necessary.

Key Features

• Single sign-on: Centralizes authentication for supported enterprise and cloud applications.
• Multifactor authentication: Adds authentication factors to protect workforce accounts.
• Universal Directory: Provides a centralized directory for identity attributes and user information.
• Lifecycle management: Automates provisioning and deprovisioning for supported applications in eligible plans.
• Adaptive MFA: Supports context-aware authentication policies in applicable plans.
• Access governance: Provides governance capabilities in eligible product packages.
• Privileged access: Offers privileged access capabilities through eligible Okta products.
• Workflow automation: Helps automate identity-related tasks across supported systems.

Also Read: Okta Alternatives and Competitors

#5. Microsoft Entra ID

Microsoft Entra ID is a cloud identity and access management service for organizations using Microsoft 365, Azure, and other enterprise applications. It supports SSO, MFA, Conditional Access, hybrid identity, and application access policies. It is relevant to RSA customers that want to consolidate workforce authentication and identity controls within their existing Microsoft environment.

Microsoft lists Entra ID P1 at $7 per user per month and P2 at $10 per user per month with annual billing in the US. P1 includes capabilities such as Conditional Access and hybrid identity management, while P2 adds identity protection, risk-based controls, and privileged identity management features. Some Microsoft subscriptions already include Entra ID licensing, so buyers should check existing entitlements and calculate the incremental cost of any required governance add-ons.

Entra ID can be a strong choice for organizations that rely on Active Directory, Microsoft 365, and Azure. It may not independently cover every advanced governance or privileged access requirement associated with a broader RSA deployment. Before migrating, compare application integrations, access review requirements, provisioning, privileged access controls, and the licensing needed for each security capability.

Key Features

• Single sign-on: Provides centralized authentication for supported Microsoft and third-party applications.
• Multifactor authentication: Adds verification requirements to protect employee accounts.
• Conditional Access: Applies access policies using supported identity, device, location, and risk signals.
• Hybrid identity: Connects cloud identity services with on-premises Active Directory.
• Identity protection: P2 provides additional risk detection and risk-based access controls.
• Privileged Identity Management: Supports controls over eligible privileged roles and access.
• Application provisioning: Automates provisioning and deprovisioning for supported applications.
• Microsoft ecosystem integration: Connects with Microsoft 365, Azure, and related security services.

Also Read: Microsoft Entra ID Alternatives and Competitors

#6. Ping Identity

Ping Identity provides identity and access management products for organizations that need workforce authentication, SSO, federation, MFA, and access policies. It is relevant to RSA customers looking for alternatives to authentication and access management capabilities, particularly in environments with complex application architectures or hybrid infrastructure.

PingOne for Workforce Essential is publicly listed at $3 per user per month, while Plus is listed at $6 per user per month. These prices are subject to contract terms and minimum requirements, including a 5,000-user minimum for the relevant workforce packages. More advanced or customized deployments may require additional products and a sales quote. Buyers should check the precise package requirements before comparing the advertised rate with their RSA contract.

Ping Identity is worth evaluating when an organization needs enterprise federation, authentication orchestration, and access management across different environments. It can be especially relevant when applications require standards-based integration or complex authentication journeys. However, governance and privileged access requirements should be assessed separately to determine whether Ping Identity alone covers the full RSA use case.

Key Features

• Single sign-on: Provides centralized access to supported applications and resources.
• Multifactor authentication: Supports additional authentication steps to protect workforce access.
• Identity federation: Connects applications with supported identity providers through standard protocols.
• Directory services: Offers directory capabilities for workforce identity and access management.
• Authentication orchestration: Supports configurable authentication journeys across supported services.
• Passwordless access: Supports passwordless and stronger authentication options, depending on configuration.
• Hybrid deployment options: Supports cloud and other deployment approaches according to the product selected.
• Application integration: Helps connect workforce authentication with supported enterprise applications.

Also Read: Ping Identity Alternatives and Competitors

#7. Idira (Formerly CyberArk)

Idira is Palo Alto Networks’ identity security platform, formerly known as CyberArk. Palo Alto Networks completed its acquisition of CyberArk in February 2026 and subsequently rebranded the identity security portfolio as Idira. The platform remains relevant to organizations evaluating RSA alternatives because it focuses on privileged access management and protecting human, machine, and AI agent identities.

Idira’s identity security capabilities include privileged access controls, credential protection, secrets management, and controls for managing access to sensitive systems. Its capabilities span human and non-human identities, with specific functionality depending on the product selected. Organizations considering Idira should evaluate the relevant products and integrations rather than assume every identity security capability is included in a single package. Enterprise pricing is generally quote-based.

Idira is worth considering when privileged access security is a primary reason for replacing part of an RSA deployment. It should not automatically be treated as a complete replacement for every RSA governance or authentication product. Organizations should identify their requirements for privileged accounts, workforce identity, access governance, and AI agent security, then compare the corresponding Idira capabilities and integration requirements.

Key Features

• Privileged access management: Helps secure privileged accounts and control access to sensitive systems.
• Credential protection: Supports the management and protection of privileged credentials.
• Secrets management: Provides capabilities for protecting and controlling access to secrets used by applications and workloads.
• Privileged session controls: Supports monitoring and control of privileged sessions, depending on the product.
• Machine identity security: Helps secure machine identities and their access to infrastructure and applications.
• AI agent identity security: Extends identity security controls to AI agent use cases supported by the platform.
• Least-privilege access: Helps limit excessive permissions and reduce standing privileged access.
• Enterprise integrations: Connects identity security workflows with supported infrastructure and security products.

Also Read: CyberArk Alternatives and Competitors

#8. Cisco Duo

Cisco Duo is an identity security and access solution focused on MFA, passwordless authentication, SSO, and device-aware access controls. It is relevant when an organization uses RSA primarily to strengthen authentication and protect application access. Duo can add authentication and device trust checks to supported access workflows, but it does not replace the full scope of an identity governance platform.

Cisco publishes four Duo plans: Free for up to 10 users, Essentials at $3 per user per month, Advantage at $6, and Premier at $9. Essentials adds features such as phishing-resistant MFA, passwordless authentication, SSO, and trusted endpoints. Advantage adds risk-based authentication and additional identity security capabilities, while Premier includes broader device trust and remote access functionality.

Duo is worth considering when the goal is to improve authentication security without deploying a broad identity governance suite. It can also complement an existing identity provider or directory service. Organizations replacing RSA should confirm whether Duo covers the required authentication methods and application integrations, and plan separately for access reviews, lifecycle governance, privileged access, or other functions outside its primary scope.

Key Features

• Multifactor authentication: Adds verification requirements to reduce account compromise risks.
• Phishing-resistant authentication: Supports stronger authentication methods designed to resist credential phishing.
• Passwordless access: Provides passwordless options in eligible plans.
• Single sign-on: Offers SSO for supported applications and access workflows.
• Trusted endpoints: Helps evaluate device trust as part of access decisions.
• Risk-based authentication: Advantage and higher tiers include risk-aware security capabilities.
• Private resource access: Premier provides remote access capabilities for supported private resources.
• Cisco security integration: Can be evaluated alongside other Cisco security services for broader coverage.

#9. Yubico

Yubico provides hardware security keys and authentication technology designed to strengthen account security. Its YubiKey devices support phishing-resistant authentication methods such as FIDO2 and WebAuthn, along with other protocols depending on the key model. Yubico is relevant to RSA customers whose main objective is to replace or strengthen hardware-token-based authentication.

Unlike a full identity security platform, Yubico primarily supplies authentication hardware and related solutions. Organizations can deploy security keys with compatible identity providers and applications to strengthen login security and reduce dependence on passwords or vulnerable one-time-code methods. Hardware pricing depends on the key model, purchasing volume, and region, while the identity platform used to manage authentication may have its own subscription costs.

Yubico is a good fit when phishing-resistant authentication is the central requirement. It is not a standalone replacement for RSA Governance & Lifecycle, privileged access management, or a complete workforce identity platform. Before selecting it, confirm compatibility with the identity provider and applications in use, the recovery process for lost keys, device enrollment procedures, and whether users need multiple authentication methods for different systems.

Key Features

• Hardware security keys: Provides physical authentication devices for compatible applications and services.
• FIDO2 and WebAuthn: Supports phishing-resistant authentication using supported key models and applications.
• Passwordless authentication: Enables passwordless sign-in where supported by the identity provider and application.
• Multifactor authentication: Can provide a possession factor alongside another authentication method.
• Enterprise deployment: Supports organizational rollout and management processes for security keys.
• Broad compatibility: Works with many identity platforms and applications that support the relevant authentication protocols.
• Account protection: Helps reduce the risk of phishing and credential theft when configured for supported flows.
• Hardware choice: Offers different key models and form factors for varied device and user requirements.

How to Choose RSA Alternatives

Start by identifying which RSA product and capabilities you want to replace. SailPoint, Saviynt, and One Identity are relevant for identity governance and lifecycle management. Okta, Microsoft Entra ID, and Ping Identity focus on workforce authentication and access management. CyberArk is worth considering for privileged access security, while Cisco Duo and Yubico are more focused on authentication. These differences matter because a specialized authentication product will not automatically replace an identity governance deployment.

Use the following criteria to narrow your shortlist:

• Define the product scope: Identify whether the project involves RSA Governance & Lifecycle, RSA ID Plus, privileged access, or a combination of products.
• Map identity workflows: Document provisioning, deprovisioning, access requests, certifications, approval rules, and compliance reports.
• Review authentication requirements: Compare MFA, phishing-resistant methods, passwordless access, SSO, federation, and device trust.
• Assess privileged access: If elevated accounts and sensitive systems are involved, evaluate credential protection, session controls, and least-privilege access.
• Check integrations: Verify compatibility with directories, HR systems, SaaS applications, cloud services, and legacy infrastructure.
• Compare AI and non-human identity controls: Assess agent discovery, ownership, authentication, permissions, lifecycle management, and auditability.
• Calculate total cost: Include licenses, product modules, privileged accounts, authentication devices, integrations, implementation, and ongoing administration.
• Plan the migration: Test identity data, credentials, policies, access assignments, and recovery processes before moving production users.
• Run a proof of concept: Validate the most important workflows with representative users, applications, and privileged accounts before committing.

Conclusion

RSA alternatives cover several different areas of identity security, so the right choice depends on the product and capabilities an organization needs. Identity governance, workforce authentication, privileged access, and phishing-resistant MFA solve related but distinct problems. Comparing vendors without separating these requirements can lead to a replacement that leaves important controls uncovered.

SailPoint, Saviynt, and One Identity are relevant for enterprise identity governance. Okta, Microsoft Entra ID, and Ping Identity are options for workforce authentication and application access, while CyberArk is particularly relevant to privileged access security. Cisco Duo and Yubico are more specialized choices for strengthening authentication and protecting login flows.

Pricing should be compared using the exact product modules, user or account counts, required integrations, and support arrangements. Public per-user prices may help establish a starting point, but governance and privileged access products often require customized quotes. Hardware-based authentication also introduces procurement and deployment considerations beyond a software subscription.

Before making a decision, document your current RSA workflows, test critical integrations, and validate migration requirements with a proof of concept. Include AI agents and other non-human identities in the evaluation if they are part of your environment. The best alternative is the one that preserves the security and compliance controls you need while fitting your technical architecture and operating model.

FAQs

1. What are the best RSA alternatives in 2026?

The best RSA alternatives in 2026 are SailPoint, Saviynt, One Identity, Okta, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping Identity, CyberArk, Cisco Duo, and Yubico are options to evaluate. The best choice depends on whether you need identity governance, workforce authentication, privileged access, or stronger authentication methods.

2. Is SailPoint a good alternative to RSA?

SailPoint is a relevant alternative when RSA is used for identity governance, access reviews, provisioning, and compliance. Compare the governance workflows, integrations, policy requirements, and implementation effort before deciding whether it meets your needs.

3. Is Saviynt better than RSA?

Neither platform is universally better. Saviynt is worth evaluating for enterprise identity governance, access risk management, and non-human identity governance. The right choice depends on your application estate, compliance requirements, identity lifecycle processes, and total cost.

4. What is the difference between RSA Governance & Lifecycle and RSA ID Plus?

RSA Governance & Lifecycle focuses on identity governance, access reviews, provisioning, and compliance-related processes. RSA ID Plus focuses more on authentication and access management. The alternatives should be selected according to which product and capabilities are being replaced.

5. Can Microsoft Entra ID replace RSA?

Microsoft Entra ID can cover many workforce identity and authentication requirements, including SSO, MFA, Conditional Access, and privileged identity controls in eligible plans. Organizations with advanced governance or specialized authentication requirements should verify whether additional products or integrations are needed.

6. Is Okta an alternative to RSA SecurID?

Okta can be an alternative for workforce identity, SSO, and MFA use cases. Organizations should compare the supported authentication methods, application integrations, policy requirements, and any hardware-token dependencies before migrating from RSA SecurID.

7. Which RSA alternative is best for identity governance?

SailPoint, Saviynt, and One Identity are relevant identity governance platforms. Compare access certifications, lifecycle automation, application connectors, segregation-of-duties controls, and compliance reporting to determine which best matches your requirements.

8. Which RSA alternative is best for privileged access management?

CyberArk is a strong candidate to evaluate for privileged access management. It focuses on protecting privileged credentials, controlling elevated access, and securing sensitive systems. Confirm that the selected products cover your specific privileged access and session monitoring requirements.

9. Can Cisco Duo replace RSA?

Cisco Duo can replace or supplement parts of RSA’s authentication functionality, including MFA, passwordless authentication, and secure access. It is not a complete replacement for identity governance or privileged access management, so additional products may be necessary.

10. Is Yubico a replacement for RSA SecurID hardware tokens?

Yubico security keys can replace or strengthen certain hardware-based authentication use cases where the identity provider and applications support compatible protocols. However, Yubico does not provide the full identity platform and management capabilities of RSA. Validate supported authentication flows and recovery procedures first.

11. How much does RSA cost?

RSA pricing depends on the product and package. RSA ID Plus publicly lists cloud-only authentication from $3 per user per month, hybrid authentication from $5, an Entra-focused plan from $6, and hybrid IAM from $7, with higher-tier enterprise pricing available by quote. RSA Governance & Lifecycle has a different pricing model, so request pricing for the exact product and requirements.

12. Does RSA support AI agent identity security?

RSA provides AI-related identity security and non-human identity governance capabilities. Organizations evaluating alternatives should compare the actual scope of agent discovery, ownership, access permissions, lifecycle management, and auditing rather than assume RSA lacks these features.

13. What should I compare when evaluating RSA competitors?

Compare the exact product scope, identity governance, authentication methods, privileged access controls, application integrations, deployment options, AI and non-human identity support, licensing, and implementation effort. A tool’s fit depends on whether it covers the workflows your organization currently relies on.

14. Are RSA alternatives available as SaaS?

Yes. Several alternatives, including SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt Identity Cloud, Okta, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping Identity, and Cisco Duo, offer cloud-based services. Deployment options vary by product, so verify whether self-hosted or hybrid deployment is required.

15. How difficult is it to migrate from RSA?

Migration complexity depends on the RSA products in use, the number of integrations, identity data quality, authentication methods, and existing policies. Governance migrations require careful mapping of roles, certifications, and provisioning rules, while authentication migrations need testing for credentials, MFA enrollment, and account recovery.

16. How should AI and non-human identities affect the choice of an RSA alternative?

Organizations using AI agents, service accounts, or automated workloads should evaluate how each platform discovers identities, assigns ownership, limits permissions, manages credentials, revokes access, and records activity. Confirm that the product covers the actual access paths used by those identities and integrates with the organization’s existing governance and security controls.