8 Best Entrust Alternatives and Competitors in 2026

Entrust Identity Enterprise is an identity and access management platform designed to protect workforce, customer, and citizen identities. It combines multi-factor authentication (MFA), adaptive and risk-based authentication, passwordless access, credential management, and federation capabilities. Its support for smart cards, digital certificates, and other high-assurance authentication methods makes it relevant to organizations with demanding security and compliance requirements.

However, not every organization needs the same combination of authentication methods, deployment options, and identity controls. Some businesses want a cloud-first identity platform with straightforward SaaS integrations, while others need stronger integration with Microsoft environments, automated user lifecycle management, or phishing-resistant authentication. Organizations evaluating Entrust may also be looking to simplify administration, consolidate identity tools, or find a pricing model that better fits their workforce.

Several identity providers offer alternatives, but their capabilities are not identical. Okta Workforce Identity and Microsoft Entra ID provide broad workforce identity services, while Ping Identity and OneLogin cover enterprise SSO, MFA, and user management. RSA ID Plus and Thales SafeNet Trusted Access are relevant for organizations with established authentication requirements. Cisco Duo and Yubico take a more focused approach to MFA and phishing-resistant authentication.

This guide compares eight Entrust alternatives in 2026, focusing on workforce identity, authentication, SSO, passwordless access, deployment flexibility, and publicly available pricing. It also highlights the use cases each platform is best suited for, so IT and security teams can shortlist products based on their existing identity infrastructure and security requirements.

Why Look for Entrust Alternatives?

Entrust Identity Enterprise supports a broad range of authentication and identity use cases, but organizations may have different priorities when selecting an IAM platform. A business moving toward cloud-based applications may prefer a SaaS-first identity service, while an organization with extensive Microsoft infrastructure may want identity controls that fit directly into its existing environment.

The deployment model is another consideration. Entrust Identity Enterprise has an on-premises foundation, whereas some competing platforms offer cloud-managed workforce identity services. Organizations should also compare how each product handles user provisioning, application integrations, adaptive authentication, device trust, and passwordless access.

Pricing and administration can influence the decision as well. Some providers publish per-user subscription plans, while others use quote-based or bundled licensing. Evaluating these differences helps organizations identify a platform that matches their authentication requirements without paying for capabilities they do not need.

Entrust Competitors Comparison

The following table compares eight Entrust alternatives across deployment, primary use case, pricing model, and G2 ratings. Pricing is based on publicly available vendor information where published; enterprise agreements, regional rates, minimum user commitments, and add-ons can change the final cost.

Tool	Deployment	Best For	Pricing Model	G2 Rating
Okta Workforce Identity	SaaS	Enterprise SSO, MFA, and identity lifecycle management	Starter: $6/user/month; Essentials: $17/user/month	4.5/5
Microsoft Entra ID	SaaS / Hybrid	Microsoft-centric workforce identity and Conditional Access	P1: $7/user/month; P2: $10/user/month	4.5/5
Ping Identity	SaaS / Hybrid	Enterprise authentication and federation	Essential: $3/user/month; Plus: $6/user/month; 5,000-user minimum	4.4/5
OneLogin	SaaS	Workforce SSO, MFA, and user lifecycle management	Basic: $3; Essentials: $6; Business: $10/user/month	4.4/5
RSA ID Plus	SaaS / Hybrid	Enterprise MFA and cloud-to-on-premises authentication	Cloud IAM: $3; Hybrid Auth: $5/user/month; other plans available	4.4/5
Thales SafeNet Trusted Access	SaaS	Enterprise MFA and access management	All-inclusive licensing; contact sales for pricing	N/A
Cisco Duo	SaaS	MFA, device trust, and phishing-resistant authentication	Free for up to 10 users; paid plans from $3/user/month	4.5/5
Yubico YubiKey	Hardware / Cloud-integrated	Phishing-resistant authentication using security keys	Hardware purchased per key; price varies by model and volume	4.5/5

Top 8 Entrust Alternatives in 2026

The platforms below address different parts of workforce identity and access security. Some are full identity platforms, while others are more specialized authentication solutions. The right choice depends on whether an organization needs to replace Entrust’s broader IAM capabilities or strengthen a particular part of its authentication setup.

#1. Okta Workforce Identity

Okta Workforce Identity is a cloud-based identity platform that helps organizations manage employee access to business applications and resources. It provides single sign-on (SSO), multi-factor authentication, directory services, and identity lifecycle capabilities. Companies can use it to centralize workforce authentication rather than managing separate credentials and access policies across individual applications.

Its application integration ecosystem is one of its main strengths. Employees can access connected SaaS and enterprise applications through a central identity layer, while IT teams can apply authentication policies across those services. Okta also offers adaptive MFA and lifecycle management capabilities through its higher-tier plans, making it relevant to organizations that need more than basic login protection.

Okta is a strong Entrust alternative for businesses moving toward cloud-managed identity and application access. Its pricing starts at $6 per user per month for the Starter suite, while the Essentials suite starts at $17 per user per month. Organizations should check the capabilities included in each suite and account for additional products or services when comparing the total cost.

Key Features

• Single Sign-On: Gives employees centralized access to connected cloud and enterprise applications using a single set of credentials.
• Multi-Factor Authentication: Adds authentication factors to help protect workforce accounts against credential-based attacks.
• Universal Directory: Provides a central directory for managing users, groups, and identity information.
• Adaptive MFA: Uses contextual signals to apply authentication requirements based on risk and access conditions.
• Identity Lifecycle Management: Helps automate user onboarding, changes, and deprovisioning across supported applications.
• Access Governance: Supports access reviews and controls for organizations that need stronger oversight of workforce permissions.
• Workflow Automation: Automates selected identity-related tasks and processes through Okta Workflows.

Also Read: Okta Alternatives and Competitors

#2. Microsoft Entra ID

Microsoft Entra ID is Microsoft’s cloud-based identity and access management service. Formerly known as Azure Active Directory, it manages authentication and access for Microsoft 365, Azure, and connected third-party applications. It is particularly relevant to organizations that already use Microsoft services and want identity policies integrated with their existing infrastructure.

The platform supports SSO, MFA, Conditional Access, identity protection, and application access management. Conditional Access allows administrators to define access requirements using signals such as user identity, device status, location, and risk. Organizations can also extend identity controls to hybrid environments through integrations with on-premises Active Directory.

Microsoft Entra ID is a practical Entrust alternative for businesses that want to centralize workforce identity around the Microsoft ecosystem. Microsoft publishes standalone pricing for its P1 and P2 plans: P1 costs $7 per user per month, and P2 costs $10 per user per month with annual commitment. Some capabilities are also included in qualifying Microsoft 365 subscriptions, so buyers should compare existing licensing before purchasing a separate plan.

Key Features

• Single Sign-On: Provides access to Microsoft and supported third-party applications through centralized authentication.
• Conditional Access: Applies access policies based on user, device, location, application, and risk-related signals.
• Multi-Factor Authentication: Requires additional verification to protect accounts and sensitive resources.
• Identity Protection: Helps detect identity-related risks and supports risk-based remediation workflows.
• Hybrid Identity: Connects cloud identity services with on-premises Active Directory environments.
• Application Management: Supports enterprise application integration and access control for SaaS and custom applications.
• Privileged Identity Management: Helps manage and control privileged access through eligible licensing.

Also Read: Microsoft Entra ID Alternatives and Competitors

#3. Ping Identity

Ping Identity provides identity and access management products for workforce, customer, and partner environments. Its workforce identity capabilities help organizations manage authentication, SSO, directory services, and access to enterprise applications. The platform is designed to support complex identity requirements across cloud and hybrid infrastructure.

PingOne for Workforce offers centralized SSO, directory services, and MFA. Its higher-tier capabilities add adaptive authentication and passwordless options, including FIDO-based authentication. Ping also supports identity federation and integrations with enterprise systems, which makes it relevant to organizations that need to connect applications and identity sources across different environments.

Ping Identity is worth considering as an Entrust alternative when authentication flexibility and federation are important requirements. Its published PingOne for Workforce pricing starts at $3 per user per month for Essential and $6 per user per month for Plus, based on an annual contract with a 5,000-user minimum. Buyers should confirm the applicable package, user commitment, and deployment requirements with Ping before comparing costs.

Key Features

• Single Sign-On: Centralizes access to SaaS and enterprise applications through a unified authentication experience.
• Multi-Factor Authentication: Adds verification methods to protect workforce identities and application access.
• Adaptive Authentication: Uses contextual and risk-based signals to adjust authentication requirements.
• Passwordless Authentication: Supports passwordless access options, including FIDO-based methods.
• Identity Federation: Connects identity systems and applications across different environments.
• PingOne Directory: Provides a cloud directory for managing workforce identities and related attributes.
• Identity Orchestration: Helps organizations connect identity services and automate authentication experiences.

Also Read: Ping Identity Alternatives and Competitors

#4. OneLogin

OneLogin is a workforce identity and access management platform that helps organizations control employee access to applications and business resources. Its core capabilities include SSO, MFA, directory services, and user lifecycle management. IT teams can use the platform to simplify authentication and manage access across a range of cloud and enterprise applications.

The platform provides centralized authentication and user management, with features that vary by subscription tier. Its SmartFactor Authentication capabilities use contextual information to help determine when additional verification is needed. OneLogin also supports integrations with HR directories and other systems, helping organizations automate selected identity administration processes.

OneLogin is a suitable Entrust alternative for businesses that want workforce SSO and MFA alongside user lifecycle management. Its published Workforce Identity plans include Basic at $3 per user per month, Essentials at $6, and Business at $10. Enterprise pricing is quote-based. The right tier depends on the number of applications, authentication controls, and automation features an organization needs.

Key Features

• Single Sign-On: Gives employees centralized access to supported applications without requiring separate logins for each service.
• Multi-Factor Authentication: Adds additional verification to workforce authentication workflows.
• SmartFactor Authentication: Uses contextual signals to support risk-aware authentication decisions.
• User Lifecycle Management: Helps automate user provisioning and deprovisioning across connected applications.
• Advanced Directory: Provides identity directory capabilities for managing users and access information.
• HR Directory Integrations: Connects workforce identity processes with supported HR systems.
• RADIUS and VLDAP Support: Supports authentication and directory use cases in environments with existing infrastructure requirements.

Also Read: OneLogin Alternatives and Competitors

#5. RSA ID Plus

RSA ID Plus is an identity and access management platform that provides authentication for cloud, hybrid, and on-premises environments. It is designed for organizations that need to secure workforce access across modern applications and existing enterprise infrastructure. Its authentication options include MFA, FIDO-based methods, biometrics, and other verification approaches.

The platform offers different plans for organizations with different infrastructure requirements. Its Cloud IAM plan focuses on cloud authentication, while Hybrid Auth extends authentication coverage to cloud and on-premises environments. RSA also offers plans with additional capabilities for Microsoft Entra environments and broader hybrid identity requirements. This makes the product relevant to businesses that cannot move every authentication workflow to the cloud at once.

RSA ID Plus is a strong Entrust alternative for organizations prioritizing enterprise authentication and hybrid access. Published pricing starts at $3 per user per month for Cloud IAM and $5 for Hybrid Auth. Other plans include Entra-focused and Hybrid IAM options at higher per-user rates. Buyers should compare the included authentication methods, integrations, and support levels before selecting a plan.

Key Features

• Cloud Authentication: Protects access to cloud applications through centralized identity and authentication controls.
• Hybrid Authentication: Supports authentication across cloud and on-premises resources.
• Multi-Factor Authentication: Provides additional verification methods for workforce access.
• FIDO-Based Authentication: Supports phishing-resistant authentication methods for compatible environments.
• Biometric Authentication: Offers biometric options as part of its supported authentication methods.
• Federation: Supports SAML-based federation and integrations with enterprise identity environments.
• RADIUS Support: Provides compatibility for network and infrastructure authentication use cases.
• Help Desk Protection: Offers additional verification capabilities for identity-related support workflows in eligible plans.

Also Read: RSA Alternatives and Competitors

#6. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access

Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is a cloud-based access management and authentication platform designed to secure access to enterprise applications and resources. It combines authentication methods, access policies, and application access management in a single service. Organizations can use it to protect workforce access while supporting different authentication requirements across their environments.

The platform supports a range of authentication methods, including hardware and software tokens. It also provides cloud RADIUS and integrations for application access, making it relevant to organizations with a mix of cloud services and existing infrastructure. Its all-inclusive licensing approach is designed to include access management, authentication, token options, and support rather than charging separately for every component.

SafeNet Trusted Access is worth evaluating as an Entrust alternative when an organization needs enterprise MFA and a broad range of authentication methods. Thales does not publish a standard per-user price on its public pricing page. Instead, it describes an all-inclusive licensing model and provides a 30-day trial, with commercial pricing available through its sales team.

Key Features

• Multi-Factor Authentication: Protects access with multiple authentication methods and verification factors.
• Hardware and Software Tokens: Supports token-based authentication for users with different security requirements.
• Access Management: Centralizes access control for supported enterprise applications and resources.
• Cloud RADIUS: Supports RADIUS-based authentication for compatible network and infrastructure use cases.
• Authentication Policies: Applies access and authentication requirements based on organizational security policies.
• Application Integrations: Connects with supported cloud and enterprise applications.
• All-Inclusive Licensing: Bundles access management and authentication capabilities, including token options and support, into its licensing model.

Also Read: Thales Alternatives and Competitors

#7. Cisco Duo

Cisco Duo is an identity security and access management solution focused on protecting workforce access to applications and resources. Its core capabilities include MFA, device trust, SSO, and passwordless authentication. Organizations can use Duo to add an additional layer of verification to existing identity systems without necessarily replacing their entire IAM infrastructure.

Duo’s authentication controls help administrators evaluate both user identity and device conditions during access attempts. Depending on the edition, organizations can use phishing-resistant MFA, passwordless authentication, trusted endpoint checks, and risk-based controls. Higher-tier plans also include broader identity security capabilities, while integrations help Duo work alongside existing directories and application environments.

Cisco Duo is a useful Entrust alternative for organizations whose main priority is strengthening workforce authentication and device-based access security. Its pricing is publicly listed: Duo Free supports up to 10 users, Essentials costs $3 per user per month, Advantage costs $6, and Premier costs $9. The paid plans differ in their identity security, device trust, and remote access capabilities.

Key Features

• Multi-Factor Authentication: Adds a second verification factor to help prevent unauthorized account access.
• Phishing-Resistant MFA: Supports authentication methods designed to reduce exposure to phishing attacks.
• Passwordless Authentication: Enables passwordless access through supported Duo and FIDO2 authentication methods.
• Single Sign-On: Provides centralized access to supported applications through compatible identity integrations.
• Trusted Endpoints: Uses device trust controls to help evaluate whether a device meets access requirements.
• Risk-Based Authentication: Applies additional authentication requirements based on risk and context in eligible editions.
• Identity Threat Detection and Response: Provides identity security capabilities in higher-tier plans.
• Remote Access: Supports access to private resources without requiring a traditional VPN in the Premier edition.

#8. Yubico YubiKey

Yubico YubiKey is a hardware security key designed to provide phishing-resistant authentication. Unlike a full IAM platform, YubiKey focuses on the authentication credential itself. Users authenticate by connecting or tapping a physical security key, depending on the model and supported device, rather than relying only on passwords or one-time codes.

YubiKeys support standards and protocols such as FIDO2 and WebAuthn, as well as other authentication methods depending on the device model. Organizations can deploy security keys for workforce sign-ins to compatible identity providers and applications. This makes YubiKey useful for protecting administrator accounts, remote employees, and other users who require stronger authentication against credential theft and phishing.

Yubico is an Entrust alternative when the primary requirement is phishing-resistant hardware authentication rather than a complete replacement for identity management, SSO, or lifecycle administration. The keys are purchased as physical devices, with prices varying by model, features, region, and order volume. Organizations should account for the cost of purchasing, distributing, managing, and replacing keys as part of their deployment plan.

Key Features

• FIDO2 and WebAuthn: Supports modern authentication standards for passwordless and strong multi-factor sign-in.
• Phishing-Resistant Authentication: Uses hardware-backed authentication to help prevent credential reuse on fraudulent websites.
• Hardware Security Keys: Provides physical authentication devices for workforce and administrator accounts.
• Multi-Protocol Support: Depending on the model, supports additional protocols such as OTP, PIV, and OpenPGP.
• Cross-Platform Compatibility: Works with supported operating systems, browsers, identity providers, and applications.
• Passwordless Sign-In: Enables passwordless authentication in compatible environments.
• Enterprise Deployment: Can be rolled out across employee groups to strengthen authentication for high-risk accounts and services.

Also Read: Yubico Alternatives and Competitors

How to Choose Entrust Alternatives

Choosing an Entrust alternative starts with identifying which parts of Identity Enterprise your organization actually uses. A business relying on smart cards, certificates, and on-premises authentication has different requirements from one using Entrust mainly for MFA and access to cloud applications. Compare products against the existing authentication environment instead of selecting a platform based only on its feature list.

Consider the following factors when evaluating alternatives:

• Deployment Requirements: Decide whether your organization needs a cloud-native identity service, a hybrid deployment, or continued support for on-premises infrastructure. Confirm that the product supports the applications and systems already in use.
• Authentication Methods: Compare support for push authentication, hardware tokens, biometrics, FIDO2, smart cards, and certificate-based credentials. Make sure the available methods meet your security and compliance requirements.
• SSO and Application Integrations: Check whether the platform integrates with the SaaS applications, enterprise software, directories, and network services employees use every day.
• Conditional and Risk-Based Access: Evaluate how each product handles device posture, location, user risk, and authentication context. These controls can help organizations apply stronger verification when access conditions change.
• Identity Lifecycle Management: If automated onboarding and offboarding are important, check the platform’s provisioning, deprovisioning, directory, and HR system integrations.
• Phishing-Resistant Authentication: Determine whether the product supports FIDO2 security keys or other phishing-resistant methods. This is especially important for administrators and users with access to sensitive systems.
• Pricing and Licensing: Compare the cost of required plans, minimum user commitments, hardware tokens, support, and additional modules. A low starting price may not represent the cost of the full deployment.
• Migration and Administration: Review migration tools, policy configuration, user enrollment, reporting, and administrative workflows. A platform that fits the existing environment may reduce deployment complexity.

Conclusion

Entrust Identity Enterprise is designed for organizations that need strong authentication across workforce, customer, and citizen identities. Its support for MFA, adaptive authentication, smart cards, certificates, and passwordless access makes it relevant to environments with high-assurance identity requirements. However, organizations that prioritize cloud-first identity, Microsoft integration, automated user management, or hardware-based phishing resistance may find a different platform better suited to their needs.

Okta Workforce Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping Identity, and OneLogin are worth considering when the goal is to manage workforce access across cloud and enterprise applications. RSA ID Plus and Thales SafeNet Trusted Access are relevant for organizations with more demanding authentication and hybrid infrastructure requirements. Cisco Duo is a focused option for MFA and device trust, while Yubico YubiKey strengthens authentication through physical security keys.

Before making a decision, map your existing Entrust configuration against the capabilities each alternative provides. Pay particular attention to authentication methods, application integrations, deployment requirements, user lifecycle processes, and the cost of the required licensing. A platform that covers the organization’s actual use cases is a better replacement than one selected simply because it offers a longer feature list.

FAQs

1. What are the best Entrust alternatives in 2026?

Some of the leading Entrust alternatives in 2026 include Okta Workforce Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping Identity, OneLogin, RSA ID Plus, Thales SafeNet Trusted Access, Cisco Duo, and Yubico YubiKey. The best option depends on whether an organization needs full workforce IAM, enterprise MFA, hybrid authentication, or phishing-resistant hardware credentials.

2. Why do organizations look for Entrust alternatives?

Organizations may evaluate Entrust alternatives because they want a cloud-first identity platform, different authentication options, closer integration with existing applications, simpler administration, or a different licensing model. Deployment requirements and the need for automated identity lifecycle management can also influence the decision.

3. Is Okta a good alternative to Entrust?

Yes. Okta Workforce Identity is a strong alternative for organizations that need cloud-based SSO, MFA, directory services, and identity lifecycle management. It is particularly relevant to businesses managing access across multiple SaaS and enterprise applications.

4. Is Microsoft Entra ID an alternative to Entrust?

Yes. Microsoft Entra ID provides workforce identity, SSO, MFA, Conditional Access, and hybrid identity capabilities. It is particularly suitable for organizations that already use Microsoft 365, Azure, and on-premises Active Directory.

5. Which Entrust alternative is best for hybrid environments?

RSA ID Plus, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping Identity, and Thales SafeNet Trusted Access are worth evaluating for hybrid environments. Their suitability depends on the organization’s on-premises infrastructure, cloud applications, authentication methods, and integration requirements.

6. Which Entrust alternative is best for MFA?

Cisco Duo, RSA ID Plus, Ping Identity, and Thales SafeNet Trusted Access are relevant options for organizations prioritizing MFA. They differ in their supported authentication methods, device controls, deployment models, and integration capabilities.

7. Does Okta offer passwordless authentication?

Yes. Okta supports passwordless and stronger authentication options through its identity platform and available authentication capabilities. Organizations should check the features included in their selected suite and any additional products required for their use case.

8. How much does Microsoft Entra ID cost?

Microsoft lists Entra ID P1 at $7 per user per month and P2 at $10 per user per month, with annual commitment. Some Entra capabilities are included in qualifying Microsoft 365 subscriptions, so organizations should check their existing licenses before purchasing a standalone plan.

9. How much does Okta Workforce Identity cost?

Okta’s published Workforce Identity pricing starts at $6 per user per month for the Starter suite and $17 per user per month for Essentials. Professional and Enterprise pricing is available through a sales quote.

10. How much does Ping Identity cost?

PingOne for Workforce Essential starts at $3 per user per month, while Plus starts at $6 per user per month. The published prices are based on an annual contract with a 5,000-user minimum.

11. Is OneLogin suitable for enterprise identity management?

Yes. OneLogin provides workforce SSO, MFA, directory services, and identity lifecycle management. Its higher-tier plans add authentication and user management capabilities for organizations with more advanced requirements.

12. What is the difference between Cisco Duo and Entrust?

Entrust Identity Enterprise is a broader IAM platform with capabilities such as credential-based access, smart card issuance, MFA, and federation. Cisco Duo focuses more specifically on workforce authentication, MFA, device trust, and passwordless access. Duo may complement an existing identity platform rather than replace every Entrust capability.

13. Is YubiKey a replacement for Entrust?

YubiKey can replace or strengthen the hardware authentication part of an Entrust deployment, but it is not a full IAM platform. It does not independently provide the same breadth of identity management, SSO, user lifecycle, or access administration capabilities.

14. Does Thales SafeNet Trusted Access support hardware tokens?

Yes. SafeNet Trusted Access supports hardware and software token authentication, along with other authentication methods. Its licensing model includes authentication and token options as part of its all-inclusive approach.

15. Which Entrust alternative supports phishing-resistant authentication?

Several alternatives support phishing-resistant authentication. These include Yubico YubiKey through FIDO2 security keys, Cisco Duo through phishing-resistant MFA options, and authentication capabilities available in Okta, Ping Identity, and RSA ID Plus.

16. What should organizations consider before migrating from Entrust?

Organizations should review their existing authentication methods, smart card and certificate requirements, application integrations, identity policies, user directories, and on-premises dependencies. They should also test user enrollment, MFA recovery, administrator access, and application compatibility before completing the migration.