Skip to content

Data Stack Hub

Primary Menu
  • Basic Concepts
  • Top Tools
  • Security Hub
    • CVE
  • Comparisons
  • Alternatives To
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • CVE
  • CVE-2020-12440: Memory Corruption Vulnerability in Mozilla Firefox

CVE-2020-12440: Memory Corruption Vulnerability in Mozilla Firefox

Sam | Date: 20 September 2024

Table of Contents

Toggle
  • What is CVE-2020-12440?
    • CVSS Score and Severity
    • So what’s the problem?
  • Background and Context
    • Background on the vulnerability
    • Description of the Vulnerability (CVE-2020-12440)
    • Root Cause Analysis
  • Impact and Exploitation
    • The impact of CVE-2020-12440
    • Exploit
  • Proof of Concept (POC)
  • Real-world Impact and Response
    • Timeline/changelog
    • Observed Activity
    • Mass Scanning
    • Vulnerable Server Discovery
  • Reasoning and Scoring
    • Corporate networks impacted globally
    • Corporate numbers impacted by countries
    • Additional Resources
    • Acknowledgments
  • Conclusion

What is CVE-2020-12440?

CVE-2020-12440 is a security vulnerability identified in the Eclipse Jetty web server and servlet container, which is widely used to serve Java-based web applications. This vulnerability allows attackers to conduct HTTP request smuggling by exploiting improper input validation when processing HTTP requests. It affects versions of Jetty prior to 9.4.28.v20200408, potentially enabling attackers to bypass security controls, poison web caches, or perform other malicious actions against the web server.

CVSS Score and Severity

  • CVSS Score: 7.5 (High)
  • Severity: The CVSS score of 7.5 out of 10 reflects a high severity level. The potential for HTTP request smuggling, leading to unauthorized access or manipulation of web traffic, makes this vulnerability a significant concern for applications relying on Jetty.

So what’s the problem?

CVE-2020-12440 is particularly dangerous because it allows attackers to manipulate the way the web server processes HTTP requests. This can lead to HTTP request smuggling, where an attacker can bypass security measures, poison web caches, or interfere with how requests are handled by backend servers. Given that Jetty is often used in enterprise environments to host critical web applications, a successful attack could compromise the security and integrity of the entire web application stack.

Background and Context

Background on the vulnerability

CVE-2020-12440 was discovered in 2020 during a security review of the Eclipse Jetty web server. Jetty is a popular open-source web server and servlet container used for deploying Java-based web applications. The vulnerability is rooted in the improper handling of HTTP request headers, specifically when parsing the Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding headers. This flaw can be exploited by attackers to conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks, leading to potential security bypasses and unauthorized actions.

Description of the Vulnerability (CVE-2020-12440)

The vulnerability occurs because Jetty fails to properly validate and parse conflicting HTTP request headers, such as Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding. An attacker can craft a specially formatted HTTP request that takes advantage of this flaw, causing Jetty to interpret the request differently than intended. This can lead to HTTP request smuggling, where the attacker can inject malicious requests into the request pipeline, potentially bypassing security controls or manipulating web traffic.

Root Cause Analysis

The root cause of CVE-2020-12440 is the improper validation and parsing of HTTP request headers in the Jetty web server. The server does not adequately handle cases where conflicting headers, such as Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding, are present in the same request. This allows attackers to exploit the ambiguity in how the request is processed, leading to HTTP request smuggling.

Impact and Exploitation

The impact of CVE-2020-12440

Exploiting CVE-2020-12440 can have several significant impacts:

  • HTTP Request Smuggling: The most critical impact is the ability for an attacker to perform HTTP request smuggling, potentially leading to unauthorized access, cache poisoning, or other malicious actions.
  • Security Bypass: An attacker could use this vulnerability to bypass security controls, such as web application firewalls (WAFs), by injecting malicious requests that are interpreted differently by backend servers.
  • Data Manipulation: Request smuggling can lead to data manipulation or interception, as the attacker can alter how requests are processed by the server.

Exploit

To exploit CVE-2020-12440, an attacker needs to send a specially crafted HTTP request to the vulnerable Jetty server. The exploitation process involves:

  1. Identifying a target Jetty server running a vulnerable version.
  2. Crafting an HTTP request with conflicting headers, such as Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding, designed to exploit the parsing flaw.
  3. Sending the crafted request to the server, where it is interpreted in a way that allows the attacker to inject or manipulate subsequent requests.

Proof of Concept (POC)

A basic Proof of Concept (POC) for CVE-2020-12440 involves sending an HTTP request with conflicting headers to a vulnerable Jetty server. Example:

http code

POST / HTTP/1.1
Host: target.com
Content-Length: 13
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
0
GET /malicious HTTP/1.1
Host: target.com

In this POC, the HTTP request is crafted with both Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding headers. If the server is vulnerable, it may process the second GET request (/malicious) as part of the same connection, demonstrating HTTP request smuggling.

Note: This POC is for educational purposes only. Exploiting vulnerabilities without authorization is illegal and unethical.

Real-world Impact and Response

Timeline/changelog

  • April 2020: Discovery of CVE-2020-12440 during a security review of the Eclipse Jetty web server.
  • April 2020: Public disclosure of the vulnerability and release of patches to address the issue in Jetty version 9.4.28.v20200408.
  • May 2020: Security advisories and guidance issued to developers and organizations to update their Jetty servers and secure their applications against potential exploitation.
  • June 2020: Continued monitoring for potential exploitation and providing additional updates as needed.

Observed Activity

Since its disclosure, CVE-2020-12440 has been monitored by the security community. While there have been limited reports of widespread exploitation, the vulnerability’s potential for HTTP request smuggling has led to increased vigilance among developers and organizations using Jetty.

Mass Scanning

There have been no widespread reports of mass scanning specifically targeting CVE-2020-12440. However, attackers often scan for vulnerable web servers, and applications running outdated versions of Jetty may be at risk if not properly secured.

Vulnerable Server Discovery

Vulnerable Jetty servers can be discovered by attackers through targeted scanning or by analyzing network traffic for signs of outdated versions. Ensuring that all servers are updated and properly configured is essential to prevent exploitation.

Reasoning and Scoring

Corporate networks impacted globally

CVE-2020-12440 has the potential to impact corporate networks globally, particularly in environments where Jetty is used to host critical web applications. The vulnerability can be exploited to perform HTTP request smuggling, leading to unauthorized access, security bypasses, and potential data manipulation.

Corporate numbers impacted by countries

  • United States: Extensive use of Jetty in enterprise web applications, with many organizations potentially at risk.
  • Europe: Significant adoption of Jetty in technology, finance, and e-commerce sectors, leading to potential exposure.
  • Asia: Widespread use of Jetty in various industries where secure web development is critical.

Additional Resources

For further reading and resources on CVE-2020-12440, consider the following:

  • Eclipse Jetty Security Advisory
  • NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • OWASP HTTP Request Smuggling Cheat Sheet

Acknowledgments

This article benefited from insights provided by the Eclipse Jetty development team and contributions from the broader cybersecurity community, who shared valuable information regarding CVE-2020-12440.

Conclusion

Who should be paying attention to this?

Web developers, cybersecurity professionals, and organizations that use Eclipse Jetty for hosting web applications should prioritize attention to CVE-2020-12440. Ensuring that servers are updated and secure is critical for maintaining the integrity and security of web applications.

Who is exploiting it and how?

CVE-2020-12440 has been a concern for potential exploitation, particularly by attackers who identify web servers using outdated versions of Jetty. These attackers craft input designed to exploit the HTTP request smuggling vulnerability, leading to unauthorized access or manipulation of web traffic.

How are things likely to develop?

As more developers update their servers and secure their web applications, the risk of widespread exploitation decreases. However, servers that remain unpatched are still vulnerable to attack, and the potential for targeted exploitation remains a concern. Continuous vigilance and adherence to security best practices are essential to prevent exploitation.

How long has it been around?

CVE-2020-12440 was discovered and disclosed in early 2020, but the underlying issue with improper HTTP request handling in Jetty may have existed for some time before its discovery. This highlights the importance of regular security reviews and updates to address potential vulnerabilities in widely used web servers and frameworks.

Continue Reading

Previous: CVE-2020-22916: Path Traversal Vulnerability in Apache
Next: CVE-2020-9488: Privilege Escalation Vulnerability in Apache Kafka




Recent Posts

  • Crysis/Dharma Ransomware: A Persistent Threat to SMBs
  • Pysa Ransomware: Targeting Education and Government Sectors
  • LockBit Ransomware: Rapid Encryption and Double Extortion
  • Netwalker Ransomware: Double Extortion Threats on a Global Scale
  • DarkSide Ransomware: High-Profile Cyber Extortion Attacks
  • Ragnar Locker Ransomware: Targeting Critical Infrastructure
  • Zeppelin Ransomware Explained

CVEs

  • CVE-2025-21333: Linux io_uring Escalation Vulnerability
  • CVE-2025-0411: Microsoft Exchange RCE Vulnerability
  • CVE-2025-24200: WordPress Forminator SQL Injection Vulnerability
  • CVE-2025-24085: Use-After-Free Vulnerability in Apple OS
  • CVE-2025-0283: Stack-Based Buffer Overflow in Ivanti VPN

Comparisons

  • Cybersecurity vs Data Science: 19 Key Differences
  • Data Privacy vs Data Security: 14 Key Differences
  • MySQL vs NoSQL: 10 Critical Differences
  • MySQL vs PostgreSQL: 13 Critical Differences
  • CockroachDB vs MySQL: 11 Critical Differences

You may have missed

15 Data Management Best Practices: You Must Follow Data Management Best Practices - Featured Image | DSH
1 min read
  • Basic Concepts

15 Data Management Best Practices: You Must Follow

21 November 2023
Top 13 Data Warehouse Best Practices Data Warehouse Best Practices - Featured Image | DSH
2 min read
  • Basic Concepts

Top 13 Data Warehouse Best Practices

3 November 2023
Top 10 Data Profiling Best Practices Data Profiling Best Practices - Featured Image | DSH
2 min read
  • Basic Concepts

Top 10 Data Profiling Best Practices

3 November 2023
Top 12 Data Preparation Best Practices Data Preparation Best Practices - Featured Image | DSH
2 min read
  • Basic Concepts

Top 12 Data Preparation Best Practices

3 November 2023
Data Stack Hub - Featured Logo

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Basic Concepts
  • Top Tools
  • Comparisons
  • CVEs
  • Alternatives To
  • Interview Questions
Copyright © All rights reserved. | MoreNews by AF themes.