Skip to content

Data Stack Hub

Primary Menu
  • Basic Concepts
  • Top Tools
  • Security Hub
    • CVE
  • Comparisons
  • Alternatives To
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Security Hub
  • Maze Ransomware: Double Extortion Attacks Explained

Maze Ransomware: Double Extortion Attacks Explained

David | Date: 25 October 2024

Maze ransomware gained notoriety in 2019 due to its double extortion tactic, where attackers not only encrypted data but also exfiltrated sensitive files and threatened to release them publicly if the ransom was not paid. At its peak, Maze was responsible for infecting over 1,000 organizations globally. The estimated financial losses, including ransom payments and downtime, are in the billions of dollars, with companies often paying ransoms ranging from $1 million to $6 million. Industries heavily affected by Maze attacks included IT services, healthcare, and manufacturing, with high-profile incidents occurring in the U.S. and Europe. Maze’s tactics, especially data exfiltration, have had a lasting impact on how ransomware attacks are executed.

Table of Contents

Toggle
  • What is Maze Ransomware?
  • How does Maze work?
  • Maze Ransomware: History and Evolution
  • Notable Attacks
  • Maze Ransomware: Impact and Threat Level
  • Maze Ransomware: Mitigation and Prevention
  • FAQs
  • Conclusion

What is Maze Ransomware?

Maze is a sophisticated ransomware that encrypts a victim’s files and demands a ransom for decryption. However, it introduced a new layer of extortion by exfiltrating data before encrypting it. This allowed attackers to threaten the victim with both data encryption and public exposure of sensitive information. Maze’s double extortion significantly increased the likelihood of victims complying with ransom demands. Maze primarily targeted large organizations, using phishing emails and exploit kits to gain initial access to systems.

How does Maze work?

Maze typically begins with a phishing email that contains a malicious attachment or link. Once the victim opens the attachment or clicks the link, malware is installed on the system, allowing attackers to gain a foothold in the network. Maze then exfiltrates sensitive files before encrypting them. The attackers demand payment in cryptocurrency, usually Bitcoin, in exchange for the decryption key. Additionally, they threaten to release the exfiltrated data if the ransom is not paid. Maze uses advanced encryption algorithms that make it nearly impossible for victims to decrypt files without the key. The double extortion method ensures that even if victims have backups, they are still pressured to pay to prevent a data leak.

Maze Ransomware: History and Evolution

Maze ransomware was first detected in May 2019 and quickly became one of the most successful ransomware families due to its innovative double extortion tactic. Over time, Maze evolved by incorporating new techniques to evade detection, such as using fileless malware, which operates entirely in a system’s memory, making it harder for antivirus software to detect. In 2020, the Maze ransomware operators publicly announced their “retirement” and claimed they would stop their operations. However, the tactics used by Maze have since been adopted by other ransomware groups like Egregor and DoppelPaymer.

Notable Attacks

Maze ransomware was responsible for several high-profile attacks, including:

  • Cognizant: In April 2020, IT services giant Cognizant suffered a Maze ransomware attack, which caused significant disruption to its business operations. The company estimated that the attack resulted in losses of between $50 million to $70 million.
  • Southwire Company: In late 2019, Southwire, a leading manufacturer of wire and cable, was targeted by Maze ransomware. The attackers exfiltrated over 120 GB of data and demanded a ransom of 850 Bitcoin (approximately $6 million at the time). When Southwire refused to pay, the attackers began releasing the stolen data.
  • City of Pensacola: In December 2019, the city of Pensacola, Florida, was hit by a Maze ransomware attack that disrupted city services and compromised sensitive data. The attackers demanded a ransom of $1 million.

Maze Ransomware: Impact and Threat Level

Maze’s double extortion tactic significantly increased the potential damage caused by ransomware attacks. Organizations that fell victim to Maze not only faced the challenge of decrypting their files but also had to contend with the risk of sensitive data being exposed publicly. Maze’s impact was particularly profound in industries such as IT services, healthcare, and manufacturing, where data privacy is paramount. The financial losses from Maze attacks are estimated in the billions, including ransom payments, legal fees, and reputational damage. Maze’s tactics have since been adopted by other ransomware families, making it a lasting influence on the ransomware landscape.

Maze Ransomware: Mitigation and Prevention

To defend against Maze ransomware and similar double extortion attacks, organizations should adopt a multi-layered approach to cybersecurity:

  • Email Security: Implement strong email filtering to block phishing attempts, which are a common vector for ransomware distribution.
  • Data Encryption: Encrypt sensitive data at rest to minimize the damage caused by exfiltration in the event of a ransomware attack.
  • Regular Backups: Maintain regular, offline backups of critical files to ensure business continuity if data is encrypted.
  • Network Segmentation: Segment networks to limit the lateral movement of ransomware and protect critical systems from being compromised.
  • Incident Response Plan: Develop and regularly update an incident response plan that includes procedures for dealing with ransomware attacks.

FAQs

  1. What makes Maze different from other ransomware?
    Maze introduced the double extortion tactic, where attackers not only encrypted files but also exfiltrated sensitive data and threatened to release it publicly.
  2. Can files encrypted by Maze be decrypted without paying the ransom?
    Without the decryption key, it is nearly impossible to recover encrypted files. However, organizations with secure backups can restore their systems without paying the ransom.
  3. How can I protect my business from Maze ransomware?
    Implementing email security, encrypting sensitive data, and maintaining offline backups are critical steps in protecting against Maze ransomware.

Conclusion

Maze ransomware marked a turning point in ransomware strategies by introducing double extortion, a tactic that has since been widely adopted by other ransomware families. The ability to exfiltrate data and threaten public exposure gave attackers additional leverage over their victims, significantly increasing the pressure to pay the ransom. Maze’s success demonstrated the evolving nature of ransomware and the need for organizations to adopt comprehensive cybersecurity measures. Although the Maze operators announced their retirement, their legacy lives on in the many ransomware families that have adopted similar tactics.

Continue Reading

Previous: Locky Ransomware: A Notorious Email-Based Threat
Next: Sodinokibi (REvil) Ransomware: Major Cyber Extortion Attacks




Recent Posts

  • Crysis/Dharma Ransomware: A Persistent Threat to SMBs
  • Pysa Ransomware: Targeting Education and Government Sectors
  • LockBit Ransomware: Rapid Encryption and Double Extortion
  • Netwalker Ransomware: Double Extortion Threats on a Global Scale
  • DarkSide Ransomware: High-Profile Cyber Extortion Attacks
  • Ragnar Locker Ransomware: Targeting Critical Infrastructure
  • Zeppelin Ransomware Explained

CVEs

  • CVE-2025-21333: Linux io_uring Escalation Vulnerability
  • CVE-2025-0411: Microsoft Exchange RCE Vulnerability
  • CVE-2025-24200: WordPress Forminator SQL Injection Vulnerability
  • CVE-2025-24085: Use-After-Free Vulnerability in Apple OS
  • CVE-2025-0283: Stack-Based Buffer Overflow in Ivanti VPN

Comparisons

  • Cybersecurity vs Data Science: 19 Key Differences
  • Data Privacy vs Data Security: 14 Key Differences
  • MySQL vs NoSQL: 10 Critical Differences
  • MySQL vs PostgreSQL: 13 Critical Differences
  • CockroachDB vs MySQL: 11 Critical Differences

You may have missed

15 Data Management Best Practices: You Must Follow Data Management Best Practices - Featured Image | DSH
1 min read
  • Basic Concepts

15 Data Management Best Practices: You Must Follow

21 November 2023
Top 13 Data Warehouse Best Practices Data Warehouse Best Practices - Featured Image | DSH
2 min read
  • Basic Concepts

Top 13 Data Warehouse Best Practices

3 November 2023
Top 10 Data Profiling Best Practices Data Profiling Best Practices - Featured Image | DSH
2 min read
  • Basic Concepts

Top 10 Data Profiling Best Practices

3 November 2023
Top 12 Data Preparation Best Practices Data Preparation Best Practices - Featured Image | DSH
2 min read
  • Basic Concepts

Top 12 Data Preparation Best Practices

3 November 2023
Data Stack Hub - Featured Logo

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Basic Concepts
  • Top Tools
  • Comparisons
  • CVEs
  • Alternatives To
  • Interview Questions
Copyright © All rights reserved. | MoreNews by AF themes.