Skip to content

Data Stack Hub

Primary Menu
  • Basic Concepts
  • Top Tools
  • Security Hub
    • CVE
  • Comparisons
  • Alternatives To
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Security Hub
  • What is Bad Rabbit Ransomware?

What is Bad Rabbit Ransomware?

David | Date: 25 October 2024

Bad Rabbit ransomware first appeared in October 2017, and while it didn’t spread as widely as other ransomware families, it caused significant disruption in Eastern Europe, particularly in Ukraine and Russia. Bad Rabbit primarily targeted transportation systems, media organizations, and critical infrastructure, leading to temporary service shutdowns and operational disruptions. The number of infections attributed to Bad Rabbit is estimated to be in the hundreds, but its impact on critical industries made it a highly disruptive cyberattack. Bad Rabbit is believed to be a variant of the NotPetya ransomware, sharing similar code and spreading mechanisms.

Table of Contents

Toggle
  • What is Bad Rabbit Ransomware?
  • How does Bad Rabbit work?
  • History and Evolution
  • Notable Attacks
  • Impact and Threat Level
  • Bad Rabbit Ransomware Mitigation and Prevention
  • FAQs
  • Conclusion

What is Bad Rabbit Ransomware?

Bad Rabbit is a type of ransomware that encrypts files on a victim’s system and demands a ransom payment for the decryption key. The ransomware primarily spreads through fake software updates that trick users into downloading and executing the malware. Once installed, Bad Rabbit encrypts a variety of file types, rendering them inaccessible to the user. Victims are presented with a ransom note that demands payment in Bitcoin, typically amounting to around 0.05 Bitcoin (approximately $300 at the time of the attacks). Unlike some other ransomware families, Bad Rabbit did not use double extortion tactics, focusing solely on encrypting files and demanding payment.

How does Bad Rabbit work?

Bad Rabbit ransomware spreads through fake Adobe Flash Player updates that are delivered via compromised websites. When users visit these websites, they are prompted to download and install what appears to be a legitimate software update. Once the user executes the file, Bad Rabbit encrypts a wide range of file types, appending a .encrypted extension to each affected file. The ransomware then displays a ransom note, demanding Bitcoin payment in exchange for the decryption key. Bad Rabbit also has the ability to spread laterally across networks using a modified version of the EternalRomance exploit, which targets outdated Windows systems. The attackers behind Bad Rabbit gave victims 40 hours to pay the ransom before the decryption key would be permanently deleted.

History and Evolution

Bad Rabbit first appeared in October 2017, and while its spread was relatively limited compared to larger ransomware outbreaks like WannaCry and NotPetya, it caused significant disruptions in targeted sectors. The ransomware shares similarities with NotPetya, including its use of the EternalRomance exploit to spread across networks. However, unlike NotPetya, Bad Rabbit did not use destructive features and allowed victims to recover their files if they paid the ransom. Although the ransomware primarily affected organizations in Ukraine and Russia, there were reports of infections in Germany, Turkey, and Bulgaria as well. Since its initial outbreak, Bad Rabbit has not evolved significantly, and its activity has largely diminished.

Notable Attacks

Bad Rabbit was responsible for several high-profile attacks, primarily targeting organizations in Eastern Europe:

  • Kyiv Metro and Odessa International Airport: In October 2017, Bad Rabbit ransomware disrupted the operations of the Kyiv Metro and Odessa International Airport in Ukraine, causing delays and service interruptions.
  • Russian Media Outlets: Bad Rabbit also targeted several major Russian media organizations, including the Interfax news agency, where it encrypted systems and temporarily halted news broadcasts.
  • Critical Infrastructure in Ukraine: Bad Rabbit affected various infrastructure sectors in Ukraine, though the attacks were quickly mitigated, preventing long-term damage.

Impact and Threat Level

Although Bad Rabbit did not infect a large number of systems, its impact was felt primarily in Eastern Europe, where it caused significant disruptions to transportation, media, and critical infrastructure. The ransomware’s ability to target critical sectors such as airports and metro systems elevated its threat level, as these sectors rely on uninterrupted service. The financial losses associated with Bad Rabbit were relatively low compared to other ransomware families, with ransom demands typically set at around $300 per victim. However, the ransomware’s disruption to essential services, particularly in Ukraine, highlighted the risks posed by ransomware targeting critical infrastructure.

Bad Rabbit Ransomware Mitigation and Prevention

To protect against Bad Rabbit ransomware, organizations should implement the following cybersecurity measures:

  • Software Updates from Trusted Sources: Ensure that all software updates are downloaded directly from official websites or trusted sources, rather than through pop-ups or third-party sites.
  • Patch Management: Regularly update and patch systems, particularly those running Windows, to close vulnerabilities that could be exploited by ransomware like Bad Rabbit.
  • Network Segmentation: Segment critical systems from general networks to prevent ransomware from spreading across the organization.
  • Backup Strategy: Maintain regular, offline backups of critical files to ensure that data can be restored without paying the ransom in the event of an attack.
  • Employee Awareness: Train employees to recognize phishing emails and fake software updates, which are common vectors for ransomware distribution.

FAQs

  1. What industries were most affected by Bad Rabbit ransomware?
    Bad Rabbit primarily targeted transportation systems, media organizations, and critical infrastructure, causing disruptions in sectors that rely on continuous service.
  2. How much did Bad Rabbit demand in ransom?
    Bad Rabbit typically demanded 0.05 Bitcoin (around $300 at the time) for the decryption key, though the amount varied depending on the victim.
  3. Is Bad Rabbit still a threat today?
    While Bad Rabbit’s activity has diminished since its initial outbreak in 2017, organizations should remain vigilant and maintain strong cybersecurity practices to prevent similar ransomware attacks.

Conclusion

Bad Rabbit ransomware may not have infected as many systems as other ransomware families, but its ability to disrupt critical infrastructure and essential services made it a significant threat during its peak in 2017. By spreading through fake software updates and exploiting vulnerabilities in Windows systems, Bad Rabbit demonstrated how targeted ransomware attacks could cause widespread operational disruptions, particularly in sectors such as transportation and media. Although its activity has declined, Bad Rabbit remains a reminder of the importance of patch management, employee training, and network segmentation in defending against ransomware attacks.

Continue Reading

Previous: Clop Ransomware: High-Value Data Extortion Attacks
Next: Jigsaw Ransomware: A Time-Based Data Destruction Threat




Recent Posts

  • Crysis/Dharma Ransomware: A Persistent Threat to SMBs
  • Pysa Ransomware: Targeting Education and Government Sectors
  • LockBit Ransomware: Rapid Encryption and Double Extortion
  • Netwalker Ransomware: Double Extortion Threats on a Global Scale
  • DarkSide Ransomware: High-Profile Cyber Extortion Attacks
  • Ragnar Locker Ransomware: Targeting Critical Infrastructure
  • Zeppelin Ransomware Explained

CVEs

  • CVE-2025-21333: Linux io_uring Escalation Vulnerability
  • CVE-2025-0411: Microsoft Exchange RCE Vulnerability
  • CVE-2025-24200: WordPress Forminator SQL Injection Vulnerability
  • CVE-2025-24085: Use-After-Free Vulnerability in Apple OS
  • CVE-2025-0283: Stack-Based Buffer Overflow in Ivanti VPN

Comparisons

  • Cybersecurity vs Data Science: 19 Key Differences
  • Data Privacy vs Data Security: 14 Key Differences
  • MySQL vs NoSQL: 10 Critical Differences
  • MySQL vs PostgreSQL: 13 Critical Differences
  • CockroachDB vs MySQL: 11 Critical Differences

You may have missed

15 Data Management Best Practices: You Must Follow Data Management Best Practices - Featured Image | DSH
1 min read
  • Basic Concepts

15 Data Management Best Practices: You Must Follow

21 November 2023
Top 13 Data Warehouse Best Practices Data Warehouse Best Practices - Featured Image | DSH
2 min read
  • Basic Concepts

Top 13 Data Warehouse Best Practices

3 November 2023
Top 10 Data Profiling Best Practices Data Profiling Best Practices - Featured Image | DSH
2 min read
  • Basic Concepts

Top 10 Data Profiling Best Practices

3 November 2023
Top 12 Data Preparation Best Practices Data Preparation Best Practices - Featured Image | DSH
2 min read
  • Basic Concepts

Top 12 Data Preparation Best Practices

3 November 2023
Data Stack Hub - Featured Logo

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Basic Concepts
  • Top Tools
  • Comparisons
  • CVEs
  • Alternatives To
  • Interview Questions
Copyright © All rights reserved. | MoreNews by AF themes.